Mandarin tree named &#39;DaisySL&#39;

ABSTRACT

‘DaisySL’ is a mid-season maturing diploid mandarin that combines medium-large sized fruit of excellent quality and production with very low seed content even in mixed plantings. It would likely be successful in the mid-season marketing window that currently has very few low-seeded, high quality cultivars.

LATIN NAME OF THE GENUS AND SPECIES

The mandarin cultivar of this invention is botanically identified as Citrus reticulata.

VARIETY DENOMINATION

The variety denomination is ‘DaisySL’.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a new and distinctive mandarin cultivar designated ‘DaisySL’, which was developed at Riverside, Calif., and derived from an irradiated bud of ‘Daisy’ mandarin. ‘Daisy’ mandarin was produced in Indio, Calif. in 1963 by J. R. Furr from a conventional hybridization of 2n ‘Fortune’×2n ‘Fremont’×mandarin. ‘Fortune’ mandarin was itself produced from a conventional hybridization of 2n ‘Clementine’×2n ‘Dancy’ mandarin made by J. R. Furr in Indio, Calif. in 1954 and released in 1964. ‘Fremont’ mandarin was obtained from a conventional hybridization of 2n ‘Clementine’ mandarin×2n ‘Ponkan’ mandarin made by P. C. Reece in Orlando, Fla. in 1948 and later fruited, selected and released by J. R. Furr in Indio, Calif. in 1964.

Irradiation of budwood from registered ‘Daisy’ trees in Lindcove, Calif., was accomplished in June, 1997 at Riverside using 50 Gray units of gamma irradiation from a Cobalt-60 irradiation source. Buds from this irradiation were propagated onto various rootstocks in the greenhouse at Riverside where they were grown to field-plantable-sized trees. These trees were planted in June 1998 at Riverside. Fruit production and evaluation began in 2001. One selection from this irradiated population (propagated on Carrizo citrange rootstock) distinguished itself from the others in having very low seed counts in comparison to the original ‘Daisy’ cultivar, and with the excellent fruit quality and normal fruit production characteristics of the ‘Daisy’ parent. After two seasons of fruiting this selection, designated as ‘Daisy IR 1’, was selected for further trials and in January 2003 buds were taken and propagated onto Carrizo and C35 citrange rootstock. Budwood was also sent in April 2003 for evaluation of disease status and elimination of viruses and other pathogens as needed to establish trial plantings. ‘DaisySL’ was known throughout experimental evaluation as Daisy IR1-(for DAISY IRradiated selection #1). Twenty trees were planted at Riverside in June 2003. Fruit production on these 20 trees commenced in 2006. In June 2004 two trees of ‘DaisySL’, which had been produced from budwood that had tested and certified as tristeza-free, were sent Lindcove, Calif. where they were planted in the citrus breeding block. In June 2004 seventy-two trees, produced in Lindcove, Calif. were planted (twelve trees each) at six sites, Arvin, Irvine, Lindcove, Oasis, Santa Paula and Woodlake, Calif. All trials were propagated equally on Carrizo and C35 citrange rootstocks. Fruit production of these propagated trees commenced in 2006 (a few trees at each site) and 2007 (all trees at all sites). The properties of ‘DaisySL’ were found to be true to type and transmissible by asexual reproduction in comparing these plantings with the original ‘DaisySL’ selection.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

‘DaisySL’ is a mid-season maturing diploid mandarin that combines medium-large sized fruit of excellent quality and production with very low seed content even in mixed plantings. It would likely be successful in the mid-season marketing window that currently has very few low-seeded, high quality cultivars.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The Figures depict various characteristics of ‘DaisySL’.

FIG. 1 shows an eight-year-old ‘mother’ tree of ‘DaisySL’ on Carrizo citrange rootstock.

FIG. 2 shows a three-year-old ‘DaisySL’ tree on Carrizo citrange rootstock at Santa Paula, Calif. (first crop).

FIG. 3 shows a bud-union of nine-year-old ‘DaisySL’ on Carrizo citrange rootstock.

FIG. 4 shows the fruit of ‘DaisySL’ taken at Riverside in February.

FIG. 5 shows fruit clusters of ‘DaisySL’ taken at Santa Paula in February.

FIG. 6 shows leaves of ‘DaisySL’

FIG. 7 shows open and closed flowers of ‘DaisySL’ mandarin

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

‘DaisySL’ is a mandarin selection developed at the University of California Riverside from an irradiated bud of the diploid mandarin cultivar ‘Daisy’, a mid-season maturing variety. ‘DaisySL’ distinguishes itself by being very low seeded (2.2 seeds/fruit) in all situations of cross-pollination, differing from ‘Daisy’ which will set from 16-25 seeds/fruit in cross-pollinated situations. Evaluation of ‘DaisySL’ mandarin began on the original tree at Riverside in 2001 and has continued annually until the present. In Riverside, Calif. ‘DaisySL’ fruit matures in winter (early-December). ‘DaisySL’ holds its fruit quality characteristics through February. Fruit size is moderately large (68 mm) averaging 135 grams per fruit. Fruit are slightly obconate in shape with a very deep orange rind color and an extremely smooth rind texture. Flesh color is very deep orange and finely-textured, fruit are juicy, with a rich, sweet and very distinctive flavor when mature. Fruit are only moderately easy to peel. Tree growth habit is spreading with excellent production commencing in the third year after planting. Alternate bearing can be a problem in trees that are not culturally managed to reduce this tendency.

Cultural practices ‘DaisySL’ mandarin can be grown according to accepted cultural practices for most mandarin varieties including planting densities of 150-250 trees per acre (375-625 trees/ha), normal fertilization and pest control practices, and the use of standard rootstocks for mandarins. Pruning may enhance production and health of the tree if applied after the second year of full fruit production. Other rootstocks adapted to more marginal growing conditions of salinity, high pH or very heavy soils may be useful in those conditions.

-   Comparison with existing mandarins:

Mid to late season maturing mandarin cultivars in production include ‘Daisy’ mandarin (the original cultivar from which ‘DaisySL’ was derived), ‘W. Murcott’ (Afourer), ‘Fortune’ mandarin, Ortanique mandarin, ‘Temple’ tangor, ‘Dancy’ mandarin ‘Minneola’ tangelo, and the mid-season Clementina selections ‘Hernandina’ and ‘Nour’. All of these cultivars will be seedy if grown in the presence of a pollenizer. Some, including the Clementina selections, ‘Fortune’, ‘Ortanique’ and ‘Page’ mandarins will have few seeds if no pollenizer is present. Recently released mid to late season cultivars that are very low-seeded include ‘Tango’ mandarin, ‘Gold Nugget’ mandarin, ‘TDE2’ mandarin hybrid (Shasta Gold®) ‘TDE3’ mandarin hybrid (Tahoe Gold®), and ‘TDE4’ mandarin hybrid (Yosemite Gold®). ‘DaisySL’ differs from these cultivars in being earlier maturing, having fruit with a smoother rind texture, and a lesser ability to maintain fruit on the tree or in storage for an extended period. Trees of ‘DaisySL’ show similar alternate bearing characteristics to these cultivars. Additional differences (summarized in Table 6) distinguish it from each of these cultivars.

‘DaisySL’ mandarin exhibits low seed numbers (<2.5 seeds per fruit) under all conditions of cross-pollination. Additionally, preliminary evaluations indicate that pollen from ‘DaisySL’ has low germination rates in culture (˜10-20%) and appears not likely to cause high seed numbers in other mandarins, specifically ‘Tango’, ‘W. Murcott’ and Clementines. A comparison of ‘DaisySL’ with other low-seeded mid and late-season mandarins is provided in Table 6 below. ‘DaisySL’ is distinctive and superior in having outstanding flavor, an exceptionally smooth rind, reduced alternate bearing, and larger fruit size preferred in some markets, although it retains the tendency of its parent ‘Daisy’ for fruit to split at levels approaching 20% in bad years.

-   Trees, foliage, and flowers:

Tree size, growth and fruit production characteristics and fruit quality characteristics have been compared in these evaluations to ‘Daisy’ mandarin from the same field block. Six-year-old ‘DaisySL’ trees in trials at Riverside, and four-year-old trees at the other six sites have been evaluated for from two to four years of fruiting (see Tables 1 and 2). Tree size and growth characteristics of ‘DaisySL’ have been consistent with ‘Daisy’ throughout the evaluations. Growth of both the ‘Daisy’ and the ‘DaisySL’ selection has been quite spreading (characterized as ‘leggy’) in the first several years of growth followed by a tendency to grow into a more spherical, slightly drooping shape in ensuing years. The nine-year-old ‘DaisySL’ tree at Riverside on Carrizo citrange rootstock is 3.3 m high and 3.7 m wide with a normal upright growth habit yielding a canopy volume of 23.65 m³. In comparison nine-year-old ‘Daisy’ control trees have averaged 3.2 m tall and 3.6 m wide yielding a canopy volume of 21.7 m³ on Carrizo citrange rootstock. Scion circumference for ‘DaisySL’ on Carrizo rootstock was 38.5 cm with the rootstock circumference 54.7 cm. Scion circumference for the nine-year old ‘Daisy’ trees averaged 36.9 cm on Carrizo rootstock and 38.2 cm on C35 rootstock. In the younger multi-location trials five-year-old ‘DaisySL’ trees on Carrizo rootstock have averaged 2.8 m in height and 3.0 m in diameter with canopy volumes of 8.48 m³ and trees on C35 rootstock averaged 2.9 m in height and 2.7 m in diameter with canopy volumes of 7.48 m³. Leaves of ‘DaisySL’ are moderately large for a mandarin (86.1 mm in length×47.9 mm in width), ovate in shape and concave in cross-section, with an acute apex with weak emargination and a convex base and are dark-green in color (adaxial—RHS Green 139A, abaxial—RHS Green 137C). Petioles are medium in length (9.5 mm) and normally lack wings. The selection lacks thorns. Flowers of ‘DaisySL’ are hermaphroditic with greenish-white petals and yellowish anthers and are borne in clusters. Pollen viability for ‘DaisySL’ is moderately low (10-20% germination vs. ˜75% germination for ‘Daisy’), and pollen production is reduced (30-40% that of ‘Daisy’) in comparison to ‘Daisy’.

TABLE 1 Tree, leaf, flower and seed characteristics (for nine-year-old tree) of ‘DaisySL’ mandarin 1. Tree height 3.7 m 2. Crown diameter 3.8 m 3. Crown shape Spreading, open 4. Trunk circumference 38.5 cm (on Carrizo rootstock) 5. Bud-union characteristics Slightly benched (citranges) 6. Rootstock-scion compatibility Excellent (with citranges) 7. Tree vigor Moderately vigorous 8. Bark color RHS Grey-Brown 199B 9. Leaf shape Ovate 10. Leaf cross-section Concave 11. Leaf blade length 86.1 mm 12. Leaf blade width 47.9 mm 13. Leaf apex Acute with weak emargination 14. Leaf base Convex 15. Leaf margins Slightly crenate 16. Leaf abaxial color RHS Green 137C 17. Leaf adaxial color RHS Green 139A 18. Petiole length 9.5 mm ± 1.1 19. Petiole width 1.5 mm 20. Petiole wings Absent 21. Petiole color RHS Green 137C 22. Thorniness Not present 23. Inflorescence type Clustered 24. Flowering habit Flowers once per year 25. Flower size 13.0 mm (medium) 26. Flower structure Complete 27. Petal color RHS White 155C 28. Anther color RHS Yellow 13B 29. Pollen viability* Low (10-20%) (*measured as in-vitro germination)

-   Fruiting, fruit and production characteristics:

Fruit of ‘DaisySL’ are slightly obconate in shape with no neck. The fruit has a slightly convex basal end (moderately depressed) with a truncate (slightly depressed) distal end, and a distinctive areola and non-persistent style. The fruit is large-sized for a mandarin (classed as Jumbo by State of California standards and size 21 for industry packing standards) averaging 68.0 mm in diameter and 60.1 mm in height with a very smooth, deep orange rind color (RHS Red-Orange N30C) and slightly conspicuous, slightly raised oil glands. The rind is moderately adherent at maturity and relatively thin averaging 3.0 mm in thickness. This rind thinness is implicated in the tendency of ‘DaisySL’ and its parent ‘Daisy’ to experience a moderately high level of splitting of fruit, sometimes as high as 20% of the total crop. The fruit interior has a fine flesh texture with 10-11 segments and a semi-solid axis of medium size at maturity. The fruit are juicy, averaging approximately 47% juice and 135 g in weight. Fruit from trees on Carrizo and C35 citrange rootstocks average 11.9-12.8% soluble solids and 1.03-1.28% acid in early December at six trial locations in California increasing to 14.2-15.8% soluble solids and 0.78-0.92% acid in early February. The fruit average 2.2 seeds per fruit in the presence of cross-pollination at all locations. Seeds, when present, are polyembryonic, yellow-white in color (Yellow-White 158B) with greyed-yellow (Greyed-Yellow 160C) colyledons and a greyed-yellow (Greyed-Yellow 163B) inner seed coat.

Full fruit production of ‘DaisySL’ begins in the third year after planting similar to ‘Daisy’. A few fruit will set in the second year after planting but not at commercially acceptable levels. Fruit production on four-year-old trees averaged 27-48 kg at four fruiting trial sites. The original tree at Riverside was similar in fruit production in the fourth year and in years 7, 8 and 9 yielded 77, 32 and 72 kg of fruit respectively indicating that in the earlier years of production the variety has somewhat of a tendency to alternate bear, similar to ‘Daisy’.

TABLE 2 Fruit characteristics of ‘DaisySL’ mandarin at maturity 1. Fruit shape Slightly obconate 2. Fruit diameter 68.0 mm ± 4.2 3. Fruit height 60.1 mm ± 2.9 4. Fruit: shape of basal end Slightly convex 5. Fruit: shape of distal end Truncate (slightly depressed) 6. Fruit: distal end areola Present (18 mm ± 1.2 mm in diameter) 7. Fruit neck Not present 8. Style Not persistent 9. Rind texture Smooth 10. Oil glands Slightly conspicuous, slightly raised 11. Rind Color RHS Orange-Red N30C 12. Rind thickness 3.0 mm 13. Albedo thickness 1.5 mm 14. Albedo color RHS Yellow Orange 23C 15. Rind adherence Moderately strong 16. Rind separation Very slight 17. Flesh (pulp) color RHS Orange-Red N30D 18. Flesh (pulp) texture Moderately fine 19. Number of segments 10-11 20. Axis: structure Semi-solid 21. Axis: size Medium 22. Navel presence Not present 23. # Seeds/fruit (mean) 2.2 (cross-pollinated conditions) 24. Seed embryony Polyembryonic 25. Seed coat color RHS Yellow-White 158B 26. Seed cotyledon color RHS Greyed-Yellow 160C 27. Seed inner coat color RHS Greyed-Yellow 163B 28. Fruit weight 135.4 g 29. % Juice^(a) 46.8% 30. % Soluble solids (at maturity) 14.6% 31. % Acid (at maturity) 0.98% 32. Season of maturity Mid-season (early Dec.-January) 33. Fruit holding ability 1-2 months on tree past maturity 34. Fruit quality after storage Good (5.6° C., 30 days) ^(a)weight of juice extracted with a reamer as a percentage of fruit weight

TABLE 3 Crop yields for ‘DaisySL’ and ‘Daisy’ (control trees) at three trial sites over two years, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008. 2006/ 2006/ 2007/ 2007/ 7 7 8 8 Tree Mean Yield Mean Yield Age Yield Range Yield Range # 2008 Root- (kg/ (kg/ (kg/ (kg/ Site Selection Trees (yrs) stock tree) tree) tree) tree) River- ‘DaisySL’ 10 6.0 Car- 32.8 24.3- 53.8 43.3- side rizo 44.9 65.4 River- ‘DaisySL’ 10 6.0 C35 37.6 27.8- 54.9 47.0- side 48.9 61.4 River- ‘DaisySL’  1 9.0 Car- 77.1 77.1 32.1 32.1 side (mother) rizo River- ‘Daisy’  2 9.0 Car- 70.6 67.5- 39.4 35.2- side control rizo 73.6 43.6 Santa ‘DaisySL’  5 4.0 Car- 26.4 19.8- 42.6 34.6- Paula rizo 38.4 55.7 Santa ‘DaisySL’  5 4.0 C35 28.9 22.6- 44.0 37.1- Paula 34.9 56.4 Santa ‘Daisy’  2 4.0 Car- 26.4 24.9- 47.9 45.1- Paula control rizo 27.9 50.7 Irvine ‘DaisySL’  9 4.0 Car- 31.4 24.5- 45.9 38.9- rizo 39.7 54.8 Irvine ‘DaisySL’ 10 4.0 C35 33.6 27.4- 47.6 33.1- 40.0 57.6 Irvine ‘Daisy’  2 4.0 Car- 28.9 27.0- 50.1 44.0- control rizo 30.8 56.2

TABLE 4 Seed counts (average number of seeds per fruit) for ‘DaisySL’ and ‘Daisy’ (control trees) at four trial sites over two years, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008. 2006/7 2007/8 % Tree Mean Mean Fruit Age Seeds/ Seeds/ with (yrs) Root- Fruit Fruit 0-2 Site Selection 2008 stock (range) (range) seeds Riverside ‘DaisySL’  6.0 Carrizo  2.41  1.41 81.3 (1.88-3.30) (0.88-2.30) Riverside ‘DaisySL’  6.0 C35  2.19  1.39 83.8 (1.50-2.88) (1.02-2.09) Riverside ‘DaisySL’  9.0 Carrizo  2.26  1.86 78.9 (mother) Riverside ‘Daisy’  9.0 Carrizo 18.9  17.2   3.2 control Santa Paula ‘DaisySL’  4.0 Carrizo  1.21  1.09 89.7 (0.78-2.31) (0.69-1.97) Santa Paula ‘DaisySL’  4.0 C35  1.49  1.26 86.5 (1.06-2.72) (0.90-2.22) Santa Paula ‘Daisy’  4.0 Carrizo 15.3  14.8   5.1 control Irvine ‘DaisySL’  4.0 Carrizo  2.16  1.61 79.9 (1.88-2.76) (1.15-2.32) Irvine ‘DaisySL’  4.0 C35  2.13  1.43 81.4 (1.51-2.87) (0.96-2.19) Irvine ‘Daisy’  4.0 Carrizo 17.4  14.9   6.1 control Lindcove ‘DaisySL’  4.0 Carrizo  2.22  1.44 86.5 (1.35-3.02) (0.77-2.11) Lindcove ‘DaisySL’  4.0 C35  2.33  1.36 88.4 (1.45-2.95) (0.88-1.97) Lindcove ‘Daisy’ 15   Carrizo 17.1  16.3   3.1 control

TABLE 5 Mean and standard deviation (S.D.) of soluble solids, acid and solids/acid ratio for DaisySL at four trial sites, 2007/8 crop year. Soluble Soluble Solids Solids % % % Acid Site Date Carrizo S.D. C35 S.D. Carrizo S.D. River- Dec. 6, 12.8 0.29 12.6 0.48 1.28 0.18 side 2007 River- Jan. 9, 14.2 0.38 14.0 0.39 1.00 0.12 side 2008 River- Feb. 6, 15.8 0.43 15.6 0.34 0.88 0.10 side 2005 Santa Dec. 5, 11.9 0.39 12.0 0.26 0.97 0.19 Paula 2007 Santa Jan. 11, 13.1 0.19 13.7 0.39 0.90 0.09 Paula 2008 Santa Feb. 8, 14.7 0.33 14.2 0.44 0.80 0.16 Paula 2008 Irvine Dec. 7, 12.1 0.66 11.9 0.49 1.03 0.14 2007 Irvine Jan. 7, 13.9 0.38 12.8 0.55 0.89 0.13 2008 Irvine Feb. 6, 15.3 0.44 13.5 0.26 0.78 0.08 2008 Lind- Dec. 12, 12.1 0.22 12.0 NA 1.33 0.24 cove 2007 Lind- Jan. 15, 13.0 0.26 13.3 0.52 1.00 0.11 cove 2008 Lind- Feb. 12, 15.8 0.33 15.5 0.41 0.90 0.07 cove 2008 % S/A S/A Acid Ratio Ratio Site Date C35 S.D. Carrizo C35 River- Dec. 6, 1.22 0.11 10.0  9.8 side 2007 River- Jan. 9, 0.95 0.10 14.2 14.7 side 2008 River- Feb. 6, 0.92 0.06 17.9 17.0 side 2005 Santa Dec. 5, 0.89 0.07 13.5 14.9 Paula 2007 Santa Jan. 11, 0.84 0.07 14.7 16.3 Paula 2008 Santa Feb. 8, 0.81 0.06 17.3 17.5 Paula 2008 Irvine Dec. 7, 1.10 0.12 11.7 10.8 2007 Irvine Jan. 7, 0.90 0.14 14.5 14.2 2008 Irvine Feb. 6, 0.77 0.11 17.8 17.5 2008 Lind- Dec. 12, 1.28 0.19  9.1  9.4 cove 2007 Lind- Jan. 15, 1.02 0.06 13.0 13.0 cove 2008 Lind- Feb. 12, 0.88 0.08 17.6 17.6 cove 2008

TABLE 6 Comparison of ‘DaisySL’ with other late season, low-seeded mandarins. Data for Riverside, California. Gold Trait ‘DaisySL’ TDE2 TDE3 TDE4 Nugget Tango Matu- Early Febru- January- Febru- Febru- Febru- rity Decem- ary February ary ary- ary- ber- March March early January Seeds  2.2  0.02  0.29  0.32 <0.1  0.22 per fruit RHS Orange- Orange- Orange- Orange- Orange Orange rind Red Red Red Red 25A N25A color N30C N3OD N30C N30C Rind very slightly papillate smooth bumpy smooth texture smooth pitted Fruit 135   185   134   175   108   90   weight (g) Fruit  0.88  0.78  0.85  0.78  0.88  0.81 height/ width Alter- medium medium medium- medium- high medium nate high high bear- ing

Fruit storage trials included storage of washed but not waxed fruit at 5.6° C. for up to 60 days with fruit samples taken every 14 days for analysis. Data indicate that the storage characteristics of ‘DaisySL’ are fair with some rind deterioration (rind drying) and some significant indication of fungal disease problems in 23% of the fruit. There was no significant deterioration in juice quality or taste over a 30 day storage period in those fruit without fungal pathogens, but with more significant rind deterioration if kept to 60 days. Overall Daisy can only be considered to be fair in storage ability due primarily to the somewhat susceptible nature of the rind to pathogen organisms. Fungicide treatment and waxing might decrease decay and rind deterioration during storage.

No susceptibilities to plant or fruit diseases or to pests beyond those normally associated with citrus species have been observed. 

1. A new and distinct cultivar of mandarin tree having the characteristics substantially as described and illustrated herein. 